AFRICAN REPORT: NIGERIA POST ELECTIONS
Peter Obi Continues his legal process to “reclaim his mandate”
In West Africa Nigeria,
Following the irregularities of the Nigerian presidential elections result, the presidential candidate of the Labour party insisted that Nigerians were robbed of their true choice, adding that he was ready to challenge the results till he proved his argument in court. Peter Obi Vowing to pursue and recover his mandate, has been going through the legal process for days now. Peter Obi, has urged his supporters not to turn the court premises into a rally ground during the hearing of his petition against the just concluded presidential election.
This was made known on Wednesday morning by Obi through some tweet posts on his official Twitter account. Obi in his statement pleaded with members of the Obidient movement to respect the sanctity of the court premises and give his legal team the space and peaceful environment to carry on their duties. The Court of Appeal in Abuja is set to rule on the application filed by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) seeking to reconfigure the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) it used to conduct the 2023 presidential election, which held on Saturday, February 27, 2023.
The court set Wednesday, March 8, 2023, for the eagerly awaited ruling. The legal team of Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of the Labour Party, a party in the suit, moved a motion requesting the court not to allow INEC to tamper with the evidence in the matter going to the Presidential Election Tribunal. According to reports, Obi’s legal team include at least twelve Senior Advocates of Nigeria. Some of them presented in order of seniority are Dr Livy Uzoukwu, SAN; Chief Awa Kalu, SAN; Dr Onyechi Ikpeazu, SAN; P.I.N. Ikwueto, SAN; Chief Ben Anyachebe, SAN; S.T. Hon, SAN; Arthur Obi Okafor, SAN; Ik Ezechukwu, SAN; J.S. Okutepa, SAN; Dr Mrs Valerie Azinge, SAN; Emeka Okpoko, SAN; and Alex Ejesieme, SAN.
According to some other reports, Obi’s legal team is still being constituted and “these are not all the senior advocates of Nigeria on the team. More are still signing up.” Obi’s legal team had argued that the data on the BVAS contains the substance of the Labour Party’s presidential candidate’s case against INEC’s unlawful manipulation of the February 25 election’s results and processes. The team informed the court that its forensic experts had not been granted access to INEC systems to inspect them before the said transfer of data, and the said process is not clearly spelt out to all parties concerned.
Obi’s lawyers questioned the motives of INEC to be so hasty to compromise the principal evidence of the election umpire’s fraudulent manipulation of the election results. In its response, the electoral body argued that it would transfer the data on the BVAS to a backup server. INEC wishes to clean up the BVAS for conducting the governorship and state legislative elections billed for Saturday, March 11, 2023. The case is being heard by a three-person Court of Appeal panel headed by Justice Joseph Ikyegh. The future of Nigeria’s democracy has come under scrutiny following the conduct of a flawed presidential election by INEC in which the electoral body declared the unpopular candidate, Bola Ahmed Tinubu of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), the winner. The three main opposition parties, Labour Party (LP), Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), have all rejected the election results announced by INEC.
LP and PDP, in an unprecedented move, jointly called for the resignation of the INEC chairman Professor Mahmood Yakubu on February 28, 2023 and for the cancellation of the exercise, which they described as a “travesty” and “rape of democracy”. According to the guardian a Nigerian newspaper. Mr Peter Obi, who ran for president with the backing of the youth population, is widely believed to have won the election by a wide margin, beating a former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar of the PDP, and Bola Tinubu, a former Lagos governor. The court of appeal has refused the request of Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of the Labour Party to restrain the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from reconfiguring the bimodal voter accreditation system (BVAS) ahead of the governorship and state assembly elections.
In the ruling delivered on Wednesday, a three-member panel of the court of appeal led by Joseph Ikyegh, held that restraining the electoral commission would constrain INEC from conducting the March 11 elections. In the application, that Peter Obi, presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP), had sought an order of the court “restraining the 1st respondent (INEC) from tampering with the information embedded in the BVAS machines until the due inspection is conducted and certified true copies (CTC) of them issued.” While so many Nigerians think that Peter Obi’s legal team made a valid point with this, the court justice also had the impact of that to the upcoming gubernatorial elections to think about. We heard a couple of youths who gave up voting ever again in Nigeria, after the presidential elections results were called, as they believed their votes didn’t count.
What’s the chances of the gubernatorial elections in Nigeria having honest results?
Well we’ll see to the final outcome in the Nigeria’s court of appeal.
